ISPO assesses the impact of Category I and II training on:
- The end user of prosthetic and orthotic devices:
- The quality of prosthetic/orthotic treatment: though continuous evaluation of ISPO-recognized P&O schools worldwide to make sure that their programmes fully adhere to the ISPO standards.
ISPO Category I graduate questionnaire
ISPO Category I employer questionnaire
ISPO Category II graduate questionnaire
ISPO Category II employer questionnaire
Field follow up
Lower Limb orthotics structured interview data form
Lower limb prosthetics structured interview data form
- Fisk J, Soderberg B, Trebbin H, Cochrane H and Stills M (2010). ISPO/LWVF Evaluation team VIETCOT graduates report. ISPO
- Sexton S, Shangali H, Munissi B (2013). Prosthetics & orthotics impact assessment: the impact of training personnel to the minimum standards ISPO Category I & II (East Africa: Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda). ISPO.
- Sexton S, Jovane R, Rosario D, Castaneda M (2015). Prosthetics & orthotics impact assessment: Latin America: Mexico, Guatemala and Colombia. ISPO. Published in English and Spanish.
- Sexton S, Stills M, Chhoeurn V, Kheng S (2015). Prosthetics & orthotics impact assessment: South East Asia: Cambodia and Lao PDR. ISPO.
- Cochrane H, Rosario D, Singh A and Ghosh R (2015). Prosthetics & orthotics impact assessment: India and Bangladesh. ISPO.
- Tardif C, Niang M, Amah A (2016). Prosthetics and orthotics impact assessment: West Africa: Togo and Benin
- Impact Assessment Appendices - English
ISPO Assessors John Fisk and Bengt Soderberg during a graduate follow-up visit
in Vietnam in 2010